First, domestic legislation should ensure that all trafficked persons, not just those who act as witnesses, are afforded protection. The UN Trafficking Protocol makes no distinction between trafficked persons who act as witnesses and those who do not in its provisions regarding State obligations to protect trafficking victims. (Article 6). The U.S. anti-trafficking law, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, states that victims of severe forms of trafficking are eligible for certain protections, including medical services, confidentiality, and protection from intimidation and reprisals from traffickers if the victim and her family are thought to be in danger (Sec. 107c). However, only severe trafficking victims who are younger than 18 or who are willing and able to assist in the prosecution of their traffickers will have the possibility to remain in the United States.
Victim protection should also include the protection of the trafficked person's privacy and assurance of confidentiality. The UN Trafficking Protocol obligates States "in appropriate cases and to the extent possible under domestic law, . . . [to] protect the privacy and identity of victims of trafficking in persons, including, inter alia, by making legal proceedings relating to such trafficking confidential." (Article 6). When victims' identities are revealed, they are placed in danger of retaliation by the trafficker. One likely scenario is that the government reveals the names of trafficked persons when they are deported, if such information is made public record. Furthermore, in cases when victims must be identified, as in the case of victims who testify or otherwise aid in prosecution, the Initiative Against Trafficking in Persons of the International Human Rights Law Group recommends that the government be prepared to grant residency to the victims and, in some cases, to family members as long the risk of retaliation exists.
The ability of a government to provide protection for victims is closely connected with how the trafficked person is viewed under domestic immigration law. When victims are deported from a destination country as a result of having violated immigration laws, their safety cannot be assured. Such victims may be re-trafficked or harmed by traffickers in retaliation. In addition, many victims face serious risk if they are returned home or to their country of origin. Victims of trafficking can be granted some level of protection through immigration policies that allow them to remain in the destination country. The OSCE recommends that States refrain from immediate expulsion of trafficked persons based on their irregular residence status. Instead, States are urged to grant victims at least temporary residence permits, without regard to whether the victim agrees to give testimony in criminal proceedings. In particularly dangerous situations, permanent residency may be warranted. The U.S. anti-trafficking law, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, is an example of legislation that includes provisions for temporary residence. The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act amends the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act, creating the T and U visa categories, which do not confer immigrant status but allow victims of trafficking to remain in the U.S. temporarily with the possibility of lawful permanent residence status in the future. The T and U visas differ in scope and availability.
In brief, to be eligible for a T visa, the victim must meet at least following requirements:
In brief, to be eligible for a U visa, the victim must meet at least following requirements:
An alternative basis for providing protection for victims of trafficking is to recognize their status as grounds for asylum. The interconnections between trafficking, smuggling and asylum policy are currently a topic of debate within the European Union. In recent years, the European Union has been undergoing a process of harmonizing its asylum procedures for member States. Differences still exist, however, in the types of benefits that asylum applications receive in EU countries, but generally changes in asylum law have aimed at tightening regulations to limit the number of asylum seekers. Human rights activists have argued that these regulations have neither enhanced refugee protection not resolved the problem of trafficking in Europe, but instead undermine existing human rights standards, including the right to asylum. A recent UNHCR Working Paper, The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy? identifies situations in which refugees may be targeted by traffickers and explains why trafficking victims may be eligible for asylum:
(1) Traffickers target vulnerable group, such as refugees in camps, many of which are women and children. The International Organization for Migration reported that traffickers in organized criminal groups abducted young women from refugee camps in Albania during the conflict in the former Yugoslavia, with the intention of forcing them into prostitution in Western Europe.
(2) Because refugees, or persons who have suffered persecution, have few means of leaving their home country, they may engage the services of a trafficker, knowingly or unknowingly, at the beginning of the journey or while in transition.
(3) The trafficked person may qualify for refugee status on the ground of persecution inherent in trafficking. This scenario is particularly likely to occur in the case of women who are trafficked into forced prostitution.
From UNHCR Working Paper, The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy? by John Morrison and Beth Crosland, April 2001 (No. 39). This paper can be accessed from the UNHCR website under "Research," "Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit," and "New Issues in Refugee Research." A pre-publication version of this paper is also available through the website of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
From UNHCR Working Paper, The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy? by John Morrison and Beth Crosland, UNHCR Policy Research Unit, April 2001 (No. 29).
The Advocates for Human Rights Site Map About the Site
330 Second Avenue South, Suite 800, Minneapolis, MN 55401 USA Phone: (612) 341-3302 Fax: (612) 341-2971 Email: email@example.com
Although Stop Violence Against Women endeavors to provide useful and accurate information, Stop Violence Against Women does not warrant the accuracy of the materials provided. Accordingly, this Web Site and its information are provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular use or purpose, or non-infringement. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so the above exclusion may not apply to you. We reserve the right to make improvements and/or changes in the format and/or content of the information contained on the Web Site without notice.This information is provided with the understanding that Stop Violence Against Women and its partners are not engaged in rendering legal or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Copyright © 2010 The Advocates for Human Rights. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to use this material for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to The Advocates for Human Rights.